🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “complete double standards” for lobbying against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Correspondence acquired by reporters sent from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the nation's political leaders asks for measures restricting tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be abandoned or delayed.

The tobacco firm seeks modifications of a pending law that include reductions in the suggested dimensions of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavored smoking items, and watered-down penalties for any firms breaking the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“Were I in government, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” commented the anti-tobacco campaigner.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year pass away from tobacco-related illnesses, according to global health agency statistics.

Chimbala said the letter was known to have been circulated to various ministerial offices and was in circulation among public interest organizations.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

This occurs during broader worries about corporate intervention with public health regulations. In recent weeks, international health experts issued a warning that the tobacco industry was escalating campaigns to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“We see evidence of business advocacy worldwide. Tobacco company fingerprints are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN international gathering,” commented the corporate monitoring director.

Likely impacts

“Should anti-smoking legislation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the cost might be borne in human lives who might potentially stop smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation going through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and stipulating that visual health alerts cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Via documentation, the company recommends this be decreased to 30% or 50% “within the WHO-FCTC suggested parameters”, deferred for no less than one year after the bill passes.

Global health authorities actually suggests a warning should cover at least half of the product container front “and aim to cover as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. In the UK, warnings must cover nearly two-thirds of a packet’s front and back.

Flavored tobacco discussion

BAT asks for the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavoured tobacco products, claiming that it would lead smokers to “illicitly sold” products. The company proposes prohibiting a smaller list of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation suggests penalties for different infractions “ranging from a fraction of annual sales to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Business explanation

Through correspondence, the corporate leader of the Zambian branch says the firm is “committed to responsible corporate conduct” and “backs the goals of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the associated health impact” but asserts that “some regulations can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued the company's suggested modifications would “dilute these regulations so much that the impact needed for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that many such provisions operated within the UK, where the corporation is based, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he commented.

“We live in a global village. When I cultivate smoking products in my garden and gather the crop and distribute the goods – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to benefit personally and all the future family lines while my community's youth are dying … is in itself complete moral bankruptcy.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the United Kingdom or other countries had not resulted in corporate closures, the advocate mentioned. “Regulations don't close the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Formal company response

The corporate communicator said: “BAT Zambia conducts its activities following with applicable local laws. Further, the company participates in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which provide for stakeholder participation in legislation creation.”

The firm positioned itself as “not resisting legislation”, the spokesperson stated, noting that young individuals should be safeguarded against acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We champion progressive regulation to realize planned population health targets, while recognizing the range of rights and obligations on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the spokesperson stated, noting that the company's suggestions “reflect the realities of the Zambian market and tobacco industry, which includes growing volumes of illicit trade”.

The nation's ministry of economic activities and commercial operations was solicited for statement.