🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.