🔗 Share this article

A Denmark-based man has been found guilty of uploading sexually explicit segments from protected movies and TV series on the social media site Reddit.

Based on a law enforcement document reviewed by media outlets, the unnamed man posted 347 video excerpts of nude content in a Reddit group he managed, which were then watched 4.2 million times.

The country's authorities state he has been handed a 7-month deferred sentence for violating copyright laws.

Legal analysts say the defendant was charged under a rarely-used clause in Danish intellectual property legislation, with the court finding that by taking the scenes out of their intended setting, the accused had harmed the artists' "ethical entitlements".

He has additionally been convicted of sharing more than 25 terabytes of protected digital content.

From March 2022 to May 2023, the man using the alias "the pseudonym KlammereFyr" on Reddit posted adult clips including over 100 actresses.

He distributed them in the forum he was a moderator of.

Per the Danish anti-piracy organization the Rights Alliance, his online community had more than 6,000 subscribers and participants were prompted to request clips of particular performers.

In 2023, advocates reported the case to the authorities on behalf of the affected artists, filmmakers and producers, which led to the subreddit being closed down.

Andrea Vagn Jensen, among the performers whose nude content were circulated in the community, explained to Danish broadcasters at the time she felt there was a difference between appearing unclothed in a film and appearing on Reddit.

The performer said the uploads amounted to "abuse".

'A significant signal'

The man was detained in September 2024 and pleaded guilty to the allegations last month.

In a comment after the ruling, TRA head the organization's leader said the outcome sent an "significant" message "that violations of creators' rights have consequences".

The ruling is viewed as unprecedented in Denmark for its use of the "moral rights" section of the national copyright law, which states an creator's creation cannot be used in a manner which infringes upon their reputation.

Copyright law expert Dr Alina Trapova told the media the case was "unusual" for its emphasis on the damage to the dignity of an artist, rather than to them economically.

The extent to which the case could influence nations abroad is uncertain.

But she added there may be "more and more of these actions" in the coming years with the advancement of artificial intelligence, where "the sanctity of one's creative output might be compromised much more easily".